Selective Prosecution using the Sedition Act 1948?
The ruling party in Malaysia, the Barisan National coalition is now back in the public’s scrutiny especially with the recent report that the Prime Minister of Malaysia himself having directed the BackBenchers to lodge police reports against a member of Parliament from the opposition party, Karpal Singh for allegedly uttering seditious remarks. Not only was one police report lodged but a few and they appear to come in an apparent well coordinated wave.
The New Straits Times reported “The Bukit Gelugor MP had said in Parliament on Monday that state governments had the right to move civil servants without consulting heads of state. He had also said that state governments should not feel intimidated by the rulers as they were not answerable in matters concerning civil administration“. So, Karpal says that state government matters (administrative matters such as transferring or termination of service) are under the purview of the state government and not the Rulers.
That, is a legal opinion which may be disputed, depending on how you interpret the state constitution and administrative laws. It may not be different from the statement made by the Prime Minister of Malaysia on 24th March, 2008 that it is unconstitutional to appoint anyone but Datuk Seri Idris Jusoh as Terengganu Mentri Besar (as nominated by him) following the General Elections in reference to Kijal assemblyman Datuk Ahmad Said receiving his letter of appointment as the new Mentri Besar from Regency Advisory Council (MPPR) chief Tengku Sri Panglima Raja Tengku Baderulzaman. In Terengganu, the Regency Advisory Council rejected the PM’s nomination of Datuk Seri Idris Jusoh in favour of Datuk Ahmad Said. Following from that, the Prime Minister was of the opinion that the appointment is unconstitutional.
So, what is the difference between an opinion made by Karpal Singh on the ruler’s power and the Prime Minister’s opinion on the Regency Advisory Council’s powers? I, for one, don’t see the difference. Both questioned the powers of the rulers. In both instances, police reports were lodged against the parties who had questioned the powers of the rulers. In both instances, there were peaceful protests by those who were unhappy with the opinions made which seemed to question the ruler’s powers. In as far as the Terengganu episode is concerned, no further action has been taken by the police todate notwithstanding the Prime Minister’s opinion which was carried out on the front page of national newspapers. Read more
Income Tax Submission via E-Filing
It’s that time of the year again when responsible Malaysians file their personal tax returns. The e-filing system is another method employed by the Income Tax Department to smoothen the hassles of filing tax returns. Prior to this, tax returns are usually done via hand delivery or by post or through tax agents. The e-filing system which was introduced about 2 years back met with a lot of teething problems. With negative feedback from users abound, I was quite skeptical about using it. Not until yesterday. Prior to this, tax payers would need to go to the Inland Revenue Board office to obtain their pin number to access the e-filing system but this year, the pin number is imprinted on the 2007 Tax Return Form.
The e-filing system, as I found out, was a breeze to use. It helped that I had broadband access at home and IRB’s server responded fast with minimal lag time. To use e-filing, you will need to have a computer running on at least Pentium III, Windows 2000 and above or Linux or Macintosh, IE 6.0, Firefox, Opera or Safari browser and Adobe Reader 7.0.5 (to read the manuals).
The first thing you need to do is to login to obtain your digital signing certificate. This is where you will need to key in your 16 digit pin number together with your identity, police, army or passport number. When successful, you will be shown your digital signing certificate which lasts for 3 years. Read more
Remedies Available When Your Insurance Claim is Rejected
Have you been in a situation where having submitted your insurance claim to your insurer, you subsequently receive a letter from your insurer telling you that the claim is declined (for whatever grounds) or your insurer giving you a less than satisfactory compensation? Or perhaps you have heard of such experiences by someone you know?
Insurance claims rejection (also known as repudiation) is not uncommon. Far more common would be a less than satisfactory compensation offered for the insurance claim. Faced with those scenarios, what remedies are available to the insured / policyholder?
Demand full explanation from Insurance Agent or Broker / Claims Department
If you have an insurance agent or broker who is servicing your account, get their assistance on this matter. Ask them to explain to you why the claim was repudiated. Insurers in Malaysia are required to state their reason/s for a repudiation and if you are unsure of the insurance terms used, your insurance agent might be able to help you. Alternatively, you should write to the Insurer for further explanation on the repudiation or to justify their amount offered for the claim. If the amount offered is not satisfactory, you are at liberty to appeal for a higher amount provided you are able to give good reasons for the same. The Insurer is obliged to give you a written reply upon your written appeal to the Manager / Senior Manager of the Claims Department. Read more